In the heyday of a booming post-World War II economy in the U.S, many food and beverage manufacturers focused on meeting the rather predictable needs of a population mostly concerned with calorie intake and satiety. During this epoch, Americans ate mostly traditional, meat-and-potatoes meals, and were largely happy with this. Eating differently didn’t confer social status, and dietary change was not seen as a serious tool for healthy living.
For a food manufacturer, attaining “premium” status was simply a matter of branding the food well (i.e., making it more desirable than other brands and asking a higher price). At the time, consumers responded to branding and were likely to accept loose arguments for premium status from a manufacturer. However, as American food culture changed in the late twentieth century, a new set of criteria emerged from a more food-centric society.
Over the past twenty years, the food industry has experienced a mind-boggling shift in food-shopping behavior that traditional economics and pricing theory cannot explain. Even ordinary middle-class consumers, at the right time, are now willing to pay 50%-400% more than the category average for what Wall Street typically views as “commodities.” Today, the new premium requires that manufacturers make concrete arguments for higher-quality status based on nuanced production and sourcing criteria specific to the category in question.
So how do you make a food premium in the new era of premium? It entails heating up a category through detailed product design that uses rare production and sourcing methods to:
- Create a new sensory experience that is complex, rich and very distinct from mass-market equivalents. (Think of the sensory difference between sandwiches made with white bread versus artisanal bread.)
- Deploy a new symbolic language to communicate rarity or refinement. This involves adding new symbols of quality into shoppers’ lexicons. The new language becomes embedded in their minds.
Example: Coffee vs. Waffles
In 1990, coffee executives could not have foreseen the havoc Starbucks was about unleash. Up until this time, Americans consumed coffee every morning but mainly appreciated it as a source of caffeine. It was not consumed as an indulgent flavor experience. However, with the Starbucks roasting and 100% Arabica-bean revolution, companies were able to convince consumers that traditional coffee was different from “high-quality” coffee. They successfully argued that their coffee had distinct sensory qualities and featured complex aromas with intriguing narratives. By simply redefining what high-quality coffee was (using symbolic and sensory attributes), $4 lattes became a feasible, wildly successful business.
Waffles, on the other hand, have never enjoyed this success. At first glance, it seems like they could have. Like coffee, frozen waffles were an established breakfast category, and many people ate them every morning. So the category had familiarity on its side. But unlike coffee, there has not really been significant innovation or new symbolism with waffles. Most innovation has related to borrowing healthy attributes from other grain-based categories and inserting them into the products. Consequently, people still see waffles as a relatively unexciting staple food that is mostly a “kid thing.” So coffee continues to grow a vibrant premium market segment, fueled by continual artisanal innovations, while frozen waffles tread water, both culturally and from a sales perspective. Unfortunately, while not insurmountable, waffles face several barriers to crafting a premium presence: The category is essentially an uninspired knockoff of an artisan one and too oriented to kids who are motivated by indulgence not health. In other words, when parental demand is inserting itself into a kid driven category and altering the sensory experience too far from its inherent indulgence, it will fail to ignite a large or fast growing premium segment.
What about the future? Can we predict which undeveloped food categories could eventually yield large premium segments in the future? Prediction may not be appropriate, but we actually are confident about a few categories that are underdeveloped in both their sensory and symbolic cues of quality. Let’s look at just one: Packaged olives.
Right now, center-store packaged olives at your neighborhood supermarket are relatively uninteresting. They come mostly in cans. Some people put them on pizza and submarine sandwiches. Hardly anyone eats them casually as a snack, as they are consumed throughout Europe. However, olives are a remarkable, untapped world of symbolic distinctions, connected to multiple geographies, Old-World histories, ritual eating experiences and highly nuanced flavors. Like coffee and wine, olives are the end result of complex chemical transformations and harvesting decisions that have roots in millennia-old traditions in Italy, Greece and Spain. Olives, therefore, have enormous potential in the new premium marketplace.
Moving forward, as members of the food industry, it is an auspicious time in American food culture to enter the new premium marketplace. The questions really are: When and how?
Obtain a free copy of “The New Premium Marketplace in American Food Culture” at: www.hartmanstrategy.com/hartbeat-exec
As CEO, Laurie Demeritt provides strategic and operational leadership for The Hartman Group’s research and consulting teams. The Hartman Group is recognized for its ability to blend qualitative, quantitative and trends research to help clients develop successful marketing strategies. Its analysts understand the subtle complexities of how consumers live, shop and eat, and how to apply that understanding in ways that lead to purchase. For more information about The Hartman Group, visit http://www.hartman-group.com/or contact Blaine Becker, senior director of marketing at: email@example.com
If you enjoyed this article, join SmartBrief’s email list for more stories about the food and beverage industry. We offer 14 newsletters covering the industry from restaurants to food manufacturing.