How effectively does your organization say “no” to work that is “off strategy?” - SmartBrief

All Articles Leadership How effectively does your organization say “no” to work that is “off strategy?”

How effectively does your organization say “no” to work that is “off strategy?”

How effectively does your organization say “no” to work that is “off strategy?”

2 min read

Leadership

SP_series1_v1

SmartPulse — our weekly nonscientific reader poll in SmartBrief on Leadership — tracks feedback from over 240,000 business leaders. We run the poll question each week in our newsletter.

How effectively does your organization say “no” to work that is “off strategy?”

  • Very: if it’s not on strategy, we don’t do it. Ever: 8%
  • Mostly: we say “no” to most distractions but not all: 33%
  • Kind of: a fair number of distractions get worked on: 22%
  • Not very: we find it difficult to say “no” to many things: 31%
  • Not at all: we work on every idea that comes our way: 7%

Focus is challenging. 60% of you report challenges with focus resulting in a fair number of distractions getting your time and energy. The most powerful word you need to learn is “no” if you want to keep things on track. A great technique for saying no to distractions is to highlight the opportunity cost of working on that project or task. When people see that a higher priority item won’t get worked on, they tend to be more receptive to not working on a task. In isolation, every task is important. It’s only when you compare it to more important work that people can see it’s a distraction from achieving your critical objectives.

Mike Figliuolo is managing director of thoughtLEADERS. Before launching his own company, he worked at McKinsey & Co., Capital One and Scotts Miracle-Gro. He is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He’s the author of three leadership books: “One Piece of Paper,” “Lead Inside the Box” and “The Elegant Pitch.”